2 min read

To Improve Treatment Times, It Pays to Become Obsessed with the Process [Part 1]

To Improve Treatment Times, It Pays to Become Obsessed with the Process [Part 1]

Often times, I hear hospitals, coordinators, and providers say that one of their main goals is to improve treatment times for X condition, or Y service line. My next questions are almost always about their current processes. It never fails that during this conversation, we discover numerous “barriers” or “hurdles” the teams have when it comes to optimizing their processes. 

But perhaps the most threatening barrier is when teams don't — or won't — take the time to dig into the current processes they have in place, and to ask WHY those processes are the way they are. If you are willing to do that exercise, you'll quickly uncover things that could be optimized, but haven't for no other reason than "Because that's how we've always done it."

Over the years, I've noticed patterns among some of the most common hurdles and process inefficiencies. If you're ready to optimize your processes for better patient care, ask yourself and your team the following questions, and take time to reflect upon the answers you gave and to seek areas where your only reason is "Because that's how we've always done it." Then ask, "Is that STILL how we should be doing it?"

  1. Does EMS activate or alert the hospital from the field? Why or Why not?
  2. What is the significance to your team of the EMS alert?
  3. Is your relationship with EMS one of mutual respect (is there reciprocated trust and understanding?) What about education on true vs. false activations?
  4. Do you or can you pre-register patients prior to arrival to the ED? If not, why?
  5. Once the patients hit the ED, do they move to an ER bed immediately, or do they stay on an EMS stretcher and go straight to CT, for example? 
  6. Where do you rack up the most time delays in your current process?
  7. If you're unsure, have you thought of capturing times to see where the bulk of your time is spent? How might you do so?
  8. Is it a lack of resources that causes delays? Or is it a lack of communication and/or broken communication systems that add up on the stopwatch timer?
  9. If your location is a spoke facility with limited services, what is your process for Door-in to Door-out? Is that process streamlined or convoluted?
  10. Once the patient gets definitive care, do you have a QA/QI process for improvement? Are all lines of communication in a closed loop fashion? How do your teams know what they did right or could improve on?

My hope is to shed some light on questions that reveal process inefficiencies, which have significant impacts on our patients, communities, clinicians, and caregivers. I’ll be going into detail on some common answers to these questions in part 2. 

In the meantime, please reach out if our team of experienced clinicians can help you talk through any of the above questions. It’s About People.

 

Arkansas EMS Org Improves Pediatric Behavioral Health Patient Care with Pulsara

Arkansas EMS Org Improves Pediatric Behavioral Health Patient Care with Pulsara

The mental health of America’s youth is under duress, and it didn’t start with COVID-19. It’s a problem that’s been a much longer time coming. In...

Read More >>
Modern MCI Response: How Texas is Solving the Crisis Communication Gap

Modern MCI Response: How Texas is Solving the Crisis Communication Gap

Imagine: In the midst of a pandemic, you're managing patient load across a state that covers over 261,000 square miles and is home to over 30 million...

Read More >>
Streamlining Crisis Response: A Deep Dive Into MCIs and Large Events

Streamlining Crisis Response: A Deep Dive Into MCIs and Large Events

Patient tracking during MCIs and pre-planned events is a complex operation with many moving parts. Every incident is different and requires different...

Read More >>